- #SKETCHUP VERSION 15.3.331 INSTALL#
- #SKETCHUP VERSION 15.3.331 SOFTWARE#
- #SKETCHUP VERSION 15.3.331 FREE#
| style="background:#9F9 vertical-align:middle text-align:center " class="table-yes"|Yes || style="background:#9F9 vertical-align:middle text-align:center " class="table-yes"|Yes || style="background:#9F9 vertical-align:middle text-align:center " class="table-yes"|Yes ProE, SolidWorks, NX, SDRC, Inventor, MDS IGES, STEP, DXF, JT, ACIS (SAT), Microstation, CATIA (V4/V5), Parasolid, Autocad, STL, XML Yappy2bhere ( talk) 03:07, 23 October 2009 (UTC) On second thought, I think it would be more useful to see them subdivided something like this: Still, it would be helpful if 3D formats followed 2D formats in the laundry list (though evidently not so helpful that I'd take the time to do it myself). Sorting them into a large, sparse table would only make it more difficult to compare more relevant features in the existing tables. Thelennonorth ( talk) 13:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Why not putting the file formats on a separate table if there are so many? Thelennonorth ( talk) 10:55, 16 October 2009 (UTC) The melange of formats suits me fine, but then I only scan for particular formats I need and the formats I want, and ignore the rest. Then in each cell, there can be yes, no or some extra info. Because there are a lot of file formats, this can be a good way to structure the support. A simple yes/no can then be placed per program for each format -Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.176.210.145 ( talk) 12:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC) A good approach would be to use the column headers for the programs and rows for the file format. This program combination is eg handy for when GPS data is to be imbedded to a model -Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.176.210.145 ( talk) 10:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC) I added some info, but it appears it will get crowdy fast, perhaps imports and exports column are best divided into subheaders where file formats are placed. Eg sketchup can import 3ds allowing blender. This allows the reader to see which program combinations are possible. The comparison should mention which imports and exports can be done with the programs. Sketchup Basic isnt mentioned (freeware) -Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.182.198.201 ( talk) 07:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC) Imports/exports FreeFlow99 ( talk) 10:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC) Sketchup
I'm too young and pretty to go to Wikijail!! Yappy2bhere ( talk) 03:07, 23 October 2009 (UTC) Why shouldn't a potential purchaser use an encyclopedia to research his/her options? Encyclopedias are not for ivory towers, they are for people to use to find the information they need, including those wishing to select a product.
#SKETCHUP VERSION 15.3.331 SOFTWARE#
Thelennonorth ( talk) 10:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Not a shopping guide? I've been using it as a Consumer Reports for software all these years. Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.37.141.122 ( talk) 21:39, (UTC) Don't agree that it's pointless, do agree that it cannot be complete and up-to-date. Wikipedia is not a shopping guide, it's an encyclopedia,Īnd the information here cannot ever be complete and up-to-date. Maybe this can give some clues: Saw it a while ago on BlenderNation: Thelennonorth ( talk) 10:49, 16 October 2009 (UTC) pointless article, should be deleted
#SKETCHUP VERSION 15.3.331 INSTALL#
Plugin's that have to come from the CD internet or any other place where the program gets installed in a seperate or integrated into the install procedure way should be flagged with something. Plugins that come with the software but are packaged and have to be unpacked or 'installed' should also count. And not counting plug ins that can be installed at any time but don't get delivered when the program is installed. Maybe it's best to draw the line to what's delivered when installing. 74.85.42.110 ( talk) 02:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Adding the available architectures the software runs on sounds like a necessary thing in such a comparison. The problem with something like that is where do you draw the line on features? The first challenge would be deciding if after market plug-ins count as features? BcRIPster ( talk) 01:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC) The Comparison of vector graphics editors article has a similar structure to what I'd like to see here. Someone put it in and never developed it. Something really exhausting: import/export formats?ħ4.85.42.110 ( talk) 01:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC) I'm not really sure what the idea was behind adding that section. Is someone planning on filling in the "features" section? Some random thoughts on that: Should the Operating System section (or a new section) also mention on what CPU architectures it runs? I just removed some erroneous data regarding Linux systems, especially since it is trivial to extract a package built for one distro and run it on another - although satisfying dependencies may take a little work.
#SKETCHUP VERSION 15.3.331 FREE#